Here is this very screen of a two-beam high-speed oscilloscope. Top U control sinusoid of particle revolutions inside the synchrotron (voltage, which is the same), SI curve from Cherenkov radiation sensors. The pulses are triangular in shape. This is data from a set, a packet of particles. Standard values are displayed by burst poppies. Below is a screen after a glass plate stands in the path of radiation. It seems that scientists are deliberately avoiding the issue of measuring the speed of light in a straightforward way. Perhaps glass is an analogue of condensed ether, according to some hypotheses, enveloping the Earth and so equalizing the speed of light to a certain constant. This is all good and interesting, but SRT has nothing to do with confirming the well-known postulate. If we talk about the plate as a substitute for ether, then, according to the enthusiasts of the Ritzs ballistic theory, the scientists of the Siberian scientific town should use ever denser screens.
If we suddenly learn that the speed of light is added to the speed of the source, simply saying: What will we have from this?. The first is high-speed space communication systems. The light (radio signal) takes 12 minutes to get to Mars. The same amount back. Almost half an hour is too much to effectively control a rover or aircraft from Earth. Plasma antennas emitting radio waves with particles accelerated in the desired direction will cut the communication time by almost half. In addition, research, no longer limited by the principle of SRT, will certainly reveal new, amazing and demanded qualities of light.
One of the features of Living Science, as the reader probably already perfectly understood, is that we consider the interaction of macroscopic bodies visible to the eye as a result of individual interactions of the microparticles that fold it. Besides the fact that the secret of the true basis of the postulate of the Theory of Relativity about the constancy of the speed of light has been solved, what else can our Science offer?
According to the conclusions of Living Science, the Sun and other celestial bodies exchange thermal motion through gravity
A certain transfer of thermal energy is possible not only by electromagnetic waves, but also, presumably, by means of a gravitational field. In the first case, according to the laws of classical quantum mechanics, the interaction is transmitted by quanta. What is quantum of the electromagnetic field is spelled out clearly in textbooks it is a photon, an oscillating thin thread, which for visible light has a length of 3 meters. Scientists write very muffled about quanta of static magnetic and electric fields. Sometimes in the reasoning and interaction schemes sticky gluons emerge. However, how exactly they help the microparticles communicate at macroscopic distances is not clear. The most problematic is the quantization of the gravitational field. It is rather difficult to imagine the forces of attraction going into infinity as a set of glomeruli-gravitons. Its a shame to say that until now, in a full-scale (laboratory) experiment, the speed of propagation of gravitational waves has not even been measured. The simplest option is vacuum, the displacement of a massive ball is to measure the response speed of the second object. By default, in calculations of the position of celestial bodies, the speed of gravity is considered infinite. In another version, it is a constant C 300,000 km. from. Nevertheless, gravitational forces, most likely, represent a web of changeable connections between elementary receivers and transmitters of the field microparticles. And in this case, heat transfer by means of gravitational interaction is quite possible.
Experience with magnets. The metallic magnetized powder in the first thermostat communicates by means of one magnetic field with a magnet heated by an electric coil. The thermal sensor does not detect the corresponding heating in the first chamber
Output
Nowadays it is generally accepted that the radioactive elements contained in the volume of the planet are responsible for heating the earths interior for no small 3.5 billion years. Dear reader, no matter how much you leaf through textbooks and monographs, you will not find a detailed report of what exactly these elements are, what their content and half-life should be in order to maintain the temperature for so long, and why, finally, the peddling chain reaction did not blow our Earth to pieces. Our option. The planets are held together by the powerful gravity of the Sun. It is through this same channel, through the so-called remote diffusion of interacting microparticles, that heat is transferred from the stars reactor into the bowels of the planets. The Earth, in turn, exchanges such latent heat with its companion, the Moon. Recall that Selena is not so cold. The temperature of its mantle, which should cool down long ago, is 200 C, and iron is boiled in the core. Perhaps you will agree with the version that, in addition to all of the above, a certain share in the heat exchange between celestial bodies, and simply bodies, is occupied by the so-called hidden light. So it turns out that only objects (arrays of matter) with the same spectrum, temperature, and, to some extent, composition, as the sender, are capable of catching the hidden component of the beam. Accordingly, such receivers-receivers in our case are certain layers of the Sun (a recognized source of energy) and the core of the Earth.
In this case, the heated permanent magnet would have to transfer heat to other magnets by means of its trembling magnetic field, even through obstacles. The author set up such experiments. They gave an ambiguous result. Within 0.1 C, when one of the magnets was heated at 120 C, at a distance of 4 cm, no heat transfer occurred. The result was also negative for a suspension of magnetized metal powder. However, this does not mean at all that such a phenomenon does not exist in nature. Avoiding the concept of central forces and replacing them with the term sum of arrays of single interactions would definitely mean a breakthrough in science.
The world in a new light
Let us analyze once again one of the fundamental experiments of modern physics. Is there ether, a kind of ocean in which light waves roll?
The classical scheme of the Michelson-Morley interferometer, a device that allegedly proved the absence of ether is as follows. The light beam is split in half by a semi-transparent tilting mirror. One ray goes towards the stream of ether, then back. Its speed changes. The second ray is perpendicular to the flow and therefore, as the experimenters assume, it serves as a kind of standard for the speed of a light wave. If the velocities do not coincide, the observed interference pattern should change. In the authors drawing, at the bottom left, it is shown that the position that the rays pass strictly perpendicular paths is incorrect. During the stroke along the arms of the interferometer, the rays are deflected by the ether stream. The detector receives waves initially deflected towards the ether stream. The scheme for constructing a real interference pattern is much more complicated than Michelsons drawings. In addition, according to the above reasoning about the Mössbauer effect, which makes observable photons only with a speed of standard C, in any case, only light waves with strictly 300 thousand km are clearly recorded. from.
In this case, the heated permanent magnet would have to transfer heat to other magnets by means of its trembling magnetic field, even through obstacles. The author set up such experiments. They gave an ambiguous result. Within 0.1 C, when one of the magnets was heated at 120 C, at a distance of 4 cm, no heat transfer occurred. The result was also negative for a suspension of magnetized metal powder. However, this does not mean at all that such a phenomenon does not exist in nature. Avoiding the concept of central forces and replacing them with the term sum of arrays of single interactions would definitely mean a breakthrough in science.
The world in a new light
Let us analyze once again one of the fundamental experiments of modern physics. Is there ether, a kind of ocean in which light waves roll?
The classical scheme of the Michelson-Morley interferometer, a device that allegedly proved the absence of ether is as follows. The light beam is split in half by a semi-transparent tilting mirror. One ray goes towards the stream of ether, then back. Its speed changes. The second ray is perpendicular to the flow and therefore, as the experimenters assume, it serves as a kind of standard for the speed of a light wave. If the velocities do not coincide, the observed interference pattern should change. In the authors drawing, at the bottom left, it is shown that the position that the rays pass strictly perpendicular paths is incorrect. During the stroke along the arms of the interferometer, the rays are deflected by the ether stream. The detector receives waves initially deflected towards the ether stream. The scheme for constructing a real interference pattern is much more complicated than Michelsons drawings. In addition, according to the above reasoning about the Mössbauer effect, which makes observable photons only with a speed of standard C, in any case, only light waves with strictly 300 thousand km are clearly recorded. from.
1. Light source 2. Detector (screen for observing the interference pattern). 3. Beam initially reflected perpendicular to the interferometer arm and deflected by the ether flow to the left. 4. A ray emitted towards the stream of ether, and therefore participates in the construction of an interference picture. 5. The beam reflected from the mirror of the interferometer arm, presumably directed along the flow. This ray is also bent by the ether. Figure above. The authors experience with the deflection of a laser beam, presumably due to entrainment by the ether. 1. Laser (rigidly fixed, having a remote power source and switch, laser pointer). 2. Laser beam when turned on at 9 oclock in the morning. 3. Beam when the laser is turned on at 17 oclock. For clarity, the beam deflection angle is increased. 4. Place the beam mark on the screen at 9 oclock in the morning. 5. Place of the beam mark at 17 oclock. The screen and the laser are separated by a distance of 90 m. The difference in the positions of the light spot in the morning and in the evening (during five days of research) is 3 cm. If the ether carries the beam, then the flow velocity is 100 km. from. This value is in good agreement with the speed of the Earths revolution around the center of the Galaxy, 200220 km. from. (taking into account that the natural rotation of the device together with the planet makes an angle of 90 degrees during this time). Why wasnt it noticed earlier? In any operation of laser communication systems, the system is zeroed out, automatically or manually. This rule applies to all devices, and is universally considered the norm. A more plausible explanation. During the day, the air in the room where the experiments are carried out warms up. An air lens is formed and distorts the beam. And, nevertheless, I believe this experience will be of interest to the reader in its own way. At least, I have not found anything like this on the Web. The third version is in good agreement with other experiments of the author. The ceiling and floor surfaces of the room, parallel to the laser beam, have special properties to attract or repel light. The lines of the diffraction grating have the same properties.