28
Регламент Международного суда. Ст. 66. Доступен на сайте суда: http://www.icj-cij.org
29
European Court of Human Rights, Rules of Court, available at http://www.echr.coe.int, Rule 32.
30
ITLOS Rules of the Tribunal, available at http://www.itlos.org, art 126.
31
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile v European Community) (Order of 20 December 2000).
32
Edward Gordon. The World Court and the Interpretation of Constitutive Treaties // American Journal of International Law. V. 59. 1965. P. 804.
33
Ibid.
34
Shany Y. The Competing Jurisdictions of International Court and Tribunals. 2004. P. 138.
35
Bin Cheng. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. 1987. P. 19, 22.
36
Венская конвенция о праве международных договоров. Принята 23 мая 1969 г. 1155 UNTS 311.
37
Shany Y. Op. cit. P. 143.
38
Chittharanjan F. Amerasinghe. Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations / 2nd edn 2005. P. 2465.
39
Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) [1949] ICJ Rep. 174.
40
См.: IACHR. The Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of the Due Process of Law, Ser A. 16. P. 58 (1999).
41
EctHR. Mamatkulov and Abdurasulovic v Turkey (2003).
42
LaGrand case (Germany v. USA). ICJ Reports, 2001.
43
South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v South Africa; Liberia v South Africa) (Second Phase) [1966] ICJ Reports. P. 6.
44
Анализ обстоятельств созыва и особенностей работы Третьей конференции по морскому праву, а также процесс формирования современного международного морского права проведен в пятитомнике «Мировой океан и международное право», написанном учеными Советского Союза и социалистических стран см.: Мировой океан и международное право. М., Наука, 19861991.
45
Все приложения составляют неотъемлемую часть Конвенции и входят в нее.
46
Rules of the Tribunal (adopted 27 April 2005) // International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Basic Texts. (Martinus Nijh off Leiden 2005). P. 15.
47
Resolution on the Internal Judicial Practice of the Tribunal (adopted 27 April 2005) // International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Basic Texts (Martinus Nijh off Leiden 2005). P. 71.
48
Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (adopted 23 May 1997) // International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ed) Basic Texts (Martinus Nijh off Leiden 2005). P. 82
49
Международная организация, созданная для реализации идеи «Общего наследия человечества» применительно к глубоководному дну Мирового океана.
50
The «Hoshinmaru» Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release. Judgment of 6 August 2007. ITLOS Reports. 20052007. P. 18.
51
Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v. Myanmar). Judgment of 14 March 2012.
52
The «Chaisiri Reefer 2» Case (Panama v. Yemen) (Prompt Release). Order of July 13. 2001. 5 Intl Trib. L. of the Sea Rep. of Judgments Advisory Opinions and Orders 8284 (2001). Available at http://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html.
53
M/V «Saiga» (No. 2) Case, Order on Provisional Measures (St. Vincent v. Guinea), 37 I. L. M. 1202 (Intl Trib. L. Sea, Mar. 11, 1998).
54
Trevers T. The Proceedings Concerning Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews // International Courts for the Twenty-First Century. L. 1996. Р. 179, 186.
54
Trevers T. The Proceedings Concerning Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews // International Courts for the Twenty-First Century. L. 1996. Р. 179, 186.
55
Robin C. Hurchill. Trends in Dispute Settlement n the Law of the Sea: Towards the Increasing Availability of Compulsory Means // International Law and Dispute Settlement. New Problems and Techniques. Edited by Duncan French Matthew Saul and Nigel D. White. 2010. P. 153.
56
См.: Комиссия международного права. Проект статей о дипломатической защите // Ежегодник Комиссии международного права. 2006. С. 16.
57
Rosenne Sh. Provisional Measures in Interbational Law. OUP, 2005. P. 3.
58
Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Interim Measures) case, PCIJ, Series a/b 79, 1939. P. 199.
59
Rosenne Sh. Op. cit. P. 46.
60
Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
61
Декларации государств о выборе суда или арбитража см: Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, U. N. Office of Legal Affairs, Settlement of Disputes Mechanism: Choice of Procedure by States Parties Under Article 287 of the Convention. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/lossdm1.htm
62
Саксина Т. Г. Арбитражное урегулирование межгосударственных морских споров: Автореферат дисс к. ю. н. М., 2007. С. 7.
63
Там же.
64
Хубиева М. Р. Практика международных судов и арбитражей, предусмотренных в Конвенции ООН по морскому праву 1982 г.: Дисс. к. ю. н. М., 2012. С. 2829.
65
Хубиева М. Р. Указ. соч. С. 30.
66
Churchill R. Some Reflections on the Operation of the Dispute Settlement System of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea During its First Decade // The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds). 2006. P. 294.
67
Хубиева М. Р. Указ. соч. С. 29.
68
Statement of Sri Lanka, 187th meeting. Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 17. P. 48. Para. 161.
69
Statement by the UN Secretary-General, 14th meeting, 20 June 1974, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 1. P. 38. Para. 42.
70
Там же.
71
Предложение Перу о создании постоянной комиссии по морскому праву. UN Doc. A/Conf.62/L.22, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 180.
72
Предложение Португалии относительно учреждения периодической конференции по морским делам. Doc. A/Conf.62/L.23, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 181.
73
См.: Nordquist M. et al. eds. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. A Commentary. V. 5. 1989. P. 252253.
74
См., напр.: Freestone D., Oude Elferink A. Flexibility and Innovation in the Law of the Sea: Will the LOS Convention amendment procedures ever be used? // Oude Elferink A. (ed.) Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: the Role of the LOS Convention, 2005. P. 173183.
75
Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds.). The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. OUP, 2010. P. 14.
76
Stephen M. Schwebel, President of the International Court of Justice. Address to the United Nations General Assembly. 26 October 1999.
77
Shigeru Oda. Some Reflections on the Dispute Settlement Clauses in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea // J. Macaraczyk (ed.) Essays in International Law, in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs, 1984. P. 115.
78
A. Boyle. Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction//International and Comparative Law Quarterly. V. 46. 1997.
79
A. Boyle. Op. cit. P. 41.
80
Вспомогательный орган Генеральной Ассамблеи ООН, созданный для содействия кодификации и прогрессивному развитию международного права.
81
Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission «Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law» (Analytical Study) (2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682.
82
Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission «Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law» (Conclusions) (2006) UN Doc A/CN/.4/L.702.
83
См., напр.: Alvarez J. E. International Organizations as Law-makers. OUP, 2006. Р. 259.
84
Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
85
Ibid. P. 232.
86
Ibid. P. 86, 90.
87
«stare decisis» понятие в англо-американской юриспруденции, которое означает обязанность суда учитывать принятые ранее судебные решения, благодаря чему формируется прецедент.
88
Oda Sh. The International Court of Justice Viewed from the Bench (19761993) // Recueil des Cours, V. 244. 1993. P. 144155.
89
Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court. P. 89.
90
Шинкарецкая Г. Г. Указ. соч. С. 100.