Redistribution of property and its simultaneous abolition by legal law immediately revived the old informal (folklore) laws and connections. It led to a variant of a new absolute monarchy, to the leaders omnipotence and his bureaucracy. This new elite could not abandon Marx because it needed to show continuity. Thats why all traditional folks expect approximately such socialism if they undertake mass migration from the countryside to the city. But there are no such people in the world anymore. Or they are petite. This also explains why throughout the 20th century, peoples were unable to see any other socialism other than peasant socialism.
Chapter 6
Worse than me!
Western culture blames dictatorships that dictators create a cult. They want to create themselves. Because they know perfectly well that the crowd chooses according to the principle worse than me. Take a look at the European leaders. The voters chose them. But for what? Macron married an adult woman by the age of his mother. Merkel lives like ordinary people. The crowd sees and rejoices: They are worse than me!
What is the difference between totalitarianism, sorry, autocracy, from such a democracy with a choice on the principle that he is worse than me? Dictators pick up harmless, spineless people without a face to secure their unlimited power. The degradation of totalitarianism comes from the top.
In a democracy, the crowd chooses idols, including politicians, on the same principle. But instead of power as the goal of life, self-love. The crowd chooses people worse than themselves. Thats why democracy degrades from below.
However, why does democracy look more stable than dictatorships? Because the choice of the crowd does not rise above the required level. With totalitarianism, a layer of managers is affected. Therefore, after the dictators departure, troubled times came. There are no guarantees of a quiet life for anyone.
In a democracy, the same, really not independent people are selected. Parliament severely limits the Chancellors power. Thats why even women are appointed military ministers. You can safely say: after all, nothing will happen. There is another invisible power over the state machine. But these are not the people. The crowd is interested in choosing a funny, harmless person. The crowd has long been studied. The egoism of the crowd has long been accustomed to and adjusted. The crowd was allowed to choose anyone, only after controlling the consequences of the choice, you are worse than me. That is why any modern president does not and cannot raise the issue of national security. The crowd never understands, it only feels. Therefore, voters are allowed to choose every four years. These elections dont solve anything. Not because the crowd reduces the level of candidates to their egoism, but because there is another level above the state level. This level is the new fascism, which is still unknown to the folks, but they feel it and are surprised by their modern so-called impotent elite.
Now the level of money is above the level of the state. Money is the only deity for humanity. If you turn off moral values, its natural. The state-level is the highest moral level of society. While there is still no de jure world government and the basic principle of the planets existence, the state principle remains the most recognizable and understandable. In fact, the new leadership style of nations is determined by money, the world currency. Hence, the crisis of state management. The state turns from the guarantor of the Constitution, that is, local morality, to put it simply, into a feeder. At this very time, people who have no access to power are trying to have it in every waymoney. In addition, they select idols singers, buffoons, showmen, talkers, etc. They select according to the principle worse than me.
PS
What is pleasant and at the same time unpleasant guest worker Jamshut for Russian fascists? Its cheap. He is an executive slave.
What is pleasant and at the same time unpleasant about Conchita Wurst? She has deviations (worse than me), but going out in public is nice. Only conservative (moral) peoples find it unpleasant. But these people do not decide anything at home. The media and the local corrupt rulers taught them to love money from the very beginning. In a generation, they will also love non-standard people like Conchita.
Chapter 7
The dictatorship of the proletariat is in the hands of Pharisees and fools
Who was the third? Will be a Future situation teaching German Nazism?
There are different dictatorships. Basically, these are the dictatorships of the elites. The ancestral nobility, the aristocracy of the caste of the military, the junta finally. The dictatorship of the oligarchy. But where did the dictatorship of the proletariat come from?
No, I know, everyone knows that Karl Marx invented this dictatorship in the heart of a revolutionary dispute with bourgeois opponents in the first half of the 19th century. But Karl Marx hated any primitive community (like the Russian one). In his letter to Vera Zasulich, he did not count on the Russians in any way. On the contrary, he considered them backward people from the Asian world. However, heres the bad luck! It was in Russia that the proletarian revolution took place. In any case, everyone still calls it that.
In fact, it was a great peasant and not a revolution at all, but a global parochial revolt that could spread to exactly the same backward Asian peoples. Folks who lived as a community. People who suffered under the despotism of their Asian elites. Throughout the 20th century, only Asia went on strike like this. But who, in fact, thought that they suffered? Asian peoples still, until our age of high technology, the Internet, quite live under the yoke of their elites and would have lived on if no one had interfered to them, had not liberated with a mission of liberation. That is, in fact, the meme of the dictatorship of the proletariat, as a cast from the primitive dictatorship of the genus, has lived an independent life of religious dogma. And it was picked up by all the religious, in fact, Asian despotic peoples. Not only the great revolutionaries shouted, but also fanatics with fools. The atheistic, at least deeply rational peoples of the West have abandoned the meme of Karl Marx. And they put forward their version of the dictatorship fascism and the nation.
Why does this meme of dictatorship still live in the form of dogma? And prevents you from clearing the way from the old deity? There are also groups of dogmatists, fanatics, hypocrites, and talkers who will definitely use the proletariat, which does not exist in the coming revolt, but it still exists precisely because of stubbornness, the most primitive egoism of old believers. In each modern car, you can see a dray. And dont strain yourself. Just turn on your imagination, and everything will match again. The descendants of Russian peasants under this meme will storm the monarch, with revolutionaries, seize power, choose their red monarch after killing revolutionaries (allegedly Jews). Then in the third generation, they will again break up into new, super modern feudal lords and no less modern, but such disenfranchised peasants. Wherever another group of dictators appears, such Pharisees will immediately see the hand of the meme. The strict ancestral morality of taboo turned into the dictatorship of the proletariat in the 19th century, thanks to Marx. But Marx did not know, could not know in the heat, that his meme would not just live an independent life of dogma, but would also repeat the evolution of the genus: a monarchy in the form of a dictatorship would take place again from the genus, then the fall of the monarchy, now red, and again disintegrate into new pieces, that is, the genus would necessarily decompose as it should. The meme of the dictatorship played its sinister joke with a lag of one century. Isnt there the greatest catch here?