And this is despite the fact that the New fascism has a shameful sign of domination only the money. Money! They dont say we will buy any one of their world leaders. In fact, they can buy anyone. They implemented these puppets in the Soviet of Europe if anything. No candidate who deviates from the line of the global financial mafia will be able to pass to the elite of Soviet Europe. If any government resists, there are always many different mechanisms at hand from financial cuts and pressure on the economy through sanctions to organized Maidan and military aggression.
The new fascism inevitably attacks the first empire that comes along, a traditional people with a glorious history, because the elite, even half consisting of plutocracy, of local oligarchs, begins to make an imperial appearance so that it is not suspected of betrayal. Here you need to understand the clash of principles if you dont want to notice the big money of discord at the heart. Who will choose what side? It is clear that the plutocracy will always betray. Plutocrats have no ideals. When an empire collapses, the whole apparatus is filled with plutocrats. This is the universal strength of SF, it has allies everywhere.
«No names» elite need to choose support.
If the main instrument of superiority over the world, over countries, over peoples is money the power and influence of the richest and most influential multi-billionaires, this leads to a conflict with the imperial elite of the no names men. «No names» officials need to choose what to rely on. Whether to rely on your people or choose money is the main criterion for selection to the world elite. No one could offer Hitler the same no-name man in terms of historical fame any place in the world hierarchy at the time, and he himself would have refused. The iconic figure of old fascism did not need a place among financiers, he hated them. Today, thanks to technological progress, and total control over all finances, and all monetary transactions, such a choice is inevitable. Any power means fame is under the microscope today. Therefore, it is easier for a no-name man to bargain for an honorable place in the new world elite than to rest on the laurels of the old design. What is a person from the position of a rich upstart? Noname man has to make a choice. Where to lead yourself and the people.
Chapter 7
Why there will be no democracy
Military democracy and commercial democracy.
Theoretical educational explanation in order to avoid a tragedy.
These are two different democracies. Military democracy was at a time of incessant war between tribes. At this time was of permanent war, hence the actual name military democracy with emphasis on the first word «war».
Military democracy is created by human warriors. During a war, no nation can choose a weak leader. Then such a people will end if neighbors will come and cut the tribe out the same tribe of warriors. Genghis Khan or Attila was tired of military steppe democracy, they defeated all his enemies. Therefore, they were chosen by the military council. This is military democracy.
Trade democracy is created by merchants. People engaged in trade were disliked at all times. The Japanese, for example, considered them a low caste. No aristocrat was engaged in commerce. Trading was done by rootless people, that is, people disrespected by the people. So, to change the situation, merchants united and bought everyone because there have been periods of long peace, and nations have not always been at war with each other. All aristocrats needed money in the name of status and luxury. The merchants made a part of the opposition aristocracy dependent, in other words, they bribed them. To thank their sponsors, the aristocracy gave them positions. Some rootless people thus gained power. It was always advantageous for merchants to have a puppet on the throne, behind the weak leader there were always merchants. Thus came the first democracy Athenian democracy. Ordinary people by voting with potsherds expelled the entire aristocracy from the city, and all people began to be called citizens. Gradually, the aristocracy was destroyed all over the world by a series of bourgeois revolutions. Instead of the aristocracy, not only citizens but also personalities appeared at this stage. Every person is a person, no matter what moral qualities he developed in himself while he lived, let him be a scoundrel and an immoral type, but he is a person from birth and has the presumption of innocence. That is, in order to become individuals, all nations must trade and give birth to great merchants, businessmen, and oligarchs. No warrior-hero is needed in the world of merchants, only in entertainment films.
And now, did nomads trade in the great steppe or did they roam with their cattle? Did they roam or trade?
If you answer this question, you will immediately find answers to why nomads cannot build a democracy of «personalities».
In the tribal world, there were relatives, brothers, sisters, uncles, and aunts, but no personalities. If the clan decided to punish a loafer or a criminal, he banished him to the steppe to certain death, because one cannot survive in the steppe, one can survive only with a collective of relatives. All modern descendants of merchants are outcasts, individualists, and egoists who have not known their relatives for many centuries. They dont need relatives. They are used to buying all the amenities. How can a people who did not practice the market and did not know about money, and we, nomads, belong to such peoples (traditions), can be instantly selfish, not remembering their kinship with brothers and sisters? This explains our problems with the so-called democracy, and why we cannot turn into Democrats on command.
We turn into democrats almost on command, this is decided by the government, which talks about democracy all the time, and they themselves enrich themselves in their family circle, that is, they use power according to the good old steppe laws.
What else does steppe democracy represent now, besides the notorious corruption?
It is quite obvious that Kazakh petty bourgeois wants to see or have steppe democracy, in any case, this is what market traders are called according to the classics: owners of beauty salons, pharmacies, and other small and even medium-sized businesses. These are the people who have raised their businesses and, consequently, have risen in their own eyes. They want democracy, believing that the era of democracy will come when Putin leaves, not even local Elbasy. They dont like Putin, to put it mildly, the most. Although here these democrats immediately merge with Kazakh nationalists, Kazakh nationalism. And there is nothing surprising in this. All traditional peoples, having received property, turn into nationalists. Probably afraid that they will take goods away from them.
What is steppe democracy on average?
At the meeting of the traditional world and world trade, steppe democracy is when people without relatives are invited to the same table (they are nothing in terms of weight in the traditional system, the traditional hierarchy) with the elite together with the oligarchs. The aristocracy has not been here for a long time. And the whole aristocracy was killed in the world because money and the market won. Former party leadership (former Communists) which declared independence, is not an aristocracy in general, but still the elite, they played the role of the poor Greek aristocracy, combined liberation from the metropolis (from Moscow) at one time, that is, combined independence with democracy, and itself with all state property. Today there is a second series after the first. If in the first series, the party and economic elite privatized all the property and created quite a traditional regime where the official is everything, the boss and the oligarch in one person, and the commoner outside the official buildings is a commoner, zero and rabble so it was, so it will always be in the traditional world, even without warriors and heroes now this is a traditional world and a traditional people. And today, those with small capitals want equal rights with those with large capitals, and both sides immediately speak their native language well (because nationalism really rules, not democracy). But it is not immediately clear who has what if the conditional former beggars of the bourgeoisie"sharua owners of boutiques sit on a par with the bais owners of industries. From the point of view of the traditional academy, this is a real mess, utter perspective chaos, a madhouse in general, and the end of the world. It is unknown who is sitting higher than whom. It is not clear who the elite is and by what criterion it is higher. This puts you into a stupor, changes the age-old paradigm of communication, and strengthens private despotism and private slavery at certain moments, but in general, it is, of course, psychosis and stress.