So, you dont have to go to the market, and you dont have to buy anything else. You can immediately choose your favorite seller as the mayor of the city.
The moment of transition from mass purchases to mass communication «for love» was described by Dale Carnegie. He wrote a training manual for all young buyers. From now on and forever, people try to sell themselves as a commodity with exceptional politeness, services, and silence when another speaks. Those who are ready to listen and praise have a better chance, as Carnegie recommended to all low, fat, and other moral freaks to be hypocrites and chameleons. Whoever praises you will win!
Thats how playing with petty self-esteem turned into a means of control.
Ive already told you. Before this tool took shape, people learned to sell and buy everything. The easier, faster, and more profitable it is, the more pleasant it is. Hence, the first mayor of Huckster, as I said.
From the mayor of the merchant to the government of the rootless is not very far either. And this mechanism also has a psychological spring of mass petty selfishness.
The first thing the government of Liberals and Democrats did was anathematize the old regime and state control, ridiculed officials, and conservative values. There is no duty, no service, no morality, no homeland. There is only one goal pleasure, making a profit, and making a profit to have fun laissez-faire!
The victory of upstarts and rootless people worldwide testifies to the fertility of all sorts of rabble. In addition, it is about the insidiousness and boundless imagination of the lower classes.
Do you think that with the proclamation of the power of an upstart mayor, a government from the smallest rootless rabble, all conservative values have disappeared?
You will be surprised. This miracle will be for you. Hierarchies do not disappear anywhere, hence classes and castes. And it was precisely because of the general crisis created by every hypocritical liberal creature because of their coveted insatiability, genetic greed (in the first generations anyway) about it Karl Marx wrote in his Manifesto. The free market of philistines highlights and monstrously emphasizes property inequality. Napoleon himself was fucked up by what the French nouveau riche were doing.
All the nouveau riche creatures, without exception, are engaged in imitation of the aristocracy, but they do it pretentiously wildly.
But they cant be an aristocracy! Couldnt. And now they cant.
And they climb into power solely for personal enrichment. To be praised by voters and hangers-on, as if Refags their new politicians buys from them (but not the goods, but the votes).
Sellers have always weighed a moral crisis in the crisis of conservative values.
When the old elite got old. When the old elite is overflowing with incompetent descendants of heroes.
Chapter 15
Be a Kazakh
Where does patriotism come from? Where did the motherland come from?
The same question can be asked: where does despotism come from, and where does democracy come from? In other words, you would know what is what when there is an external and internal migration. When mass migration occurs, everything falls into place. Migrants do not need an old homeland. It abandoned them, and these people betrayed their homeland (such mutual contempt). However, you cant throw the words out of the song. People are often overcome by nostalgia, and successful people are strongly remembered at home. What is broken cannot be glued together. This is not a sentimental foreplay. This is the clarification of the monster. A migrant never knows the word homeland, no matter how often he utters it in public and does not talk about it. Once betrayed, he will betray again. This is mutual hostility, invisible to the eyes of others. No one will ever see this struggle (just as no one will hear the thoughts of an orphan). It is only in the second generation that migrant children pronounce the word love. You cant force migrant children back to return to the land of their fathers. From that moment on, democracy is born. That is, democracy is the homeland of all emigrant children, even though they have not yet been born until they know it. But when they are born, their parents try very hard to ensure they get a good homeland, that is, that the children have everything and what is kindness? That is so that the children have property and land. There is no need for any other care. Thats how all the American Aborigines lost their lands.
The Indians, in turn, could pronounce the word homeland, but not because all the owners peoples understood this word. The Indians did not have a homeland like the Europeans, but they had a territory where they hunted. They did not have time to call their homeland their homeland, so they had to have an «Asian despotism.» The one in the form of the rarest wild civilizations of the Maya, Incas, and Aztecs, which was pilloried by the conquistadors and their descendants. In the civilizations of the Maya, Incas, and Aztecs, with one eye, everyone would see the causes of despotism. Despotisms, autocracies, and totalitarian systems are typical of the old homeland of migrants (that is, a world without democrats and their descendants). While migrant children are settling in, they are always democrats and bequeath democracy to the future (and then impose it on the whole world, by the way).
Just like that, we playfully answer the greatest mystery of mankind where Asian despotism and Western democracy come from.
If you want a democratic system, migrate wherever you can, even to the moon. And there, download the rights to local lunatics. If you cant move far away, then you are a backward person (at the moment, anyway). But all the nomads left on earth, or their descendants, want to build democracy according to European patterns. Its like if all the Maya, Inca, Aymara, and Iroquois Indians are dressed in tailcoats none of this will work. There is an inevitable evolutionary line (accumulation of skills, collection of experience) that cannot be jumped over (as one cannot jump over formations, although Marxist Bolsheviks tried to work miracles)
No matter what the nomads build, what they do not declare, or do not glorify, there will still be nomadism, and there will still be autocracy. Of course, it will differ from the Asian wildness, from the «Asiatic» according to the Europeanized, but it will still be the khans prerogative (if we mean the nomadic Turks, then the Kazakhs as well). Nomads do not understand the word homeland by idea. No, of course, according to textbooks, manuals, and the system, all descendants pronounce this word. But these are all words for the air. Millions of nomads can pronounce this word in the chorus but do not understand (in fact, they will breed corruption of unprecedented proportions). For the concept of homeland to float across the sky at this moment, it is not obliged to travel through the historical epochs of European peoples. The people of the owners who had property came up with this word. First, these people settled down and stopped wandering. Therefore, they divided the plots and put up family signs.
However, what is done is done. The nomads had no experience signing land, but they could put tamga (mark) on the ears of cattle and sign new territories with the hooves of their cavalry. Modern nomads no longer need cavalry (the first cruise missile will bring their warlike fervor back to normal). The nomads gained knowledge. Yes, this is someone elses knowledge. But this is knowledge. Knowledge allows you to control everything, even primitive instincts. First, to prevent nomads from fleeing to the steppe from responsibility (and today to run around the world for show-offs to show relatives: «Im here in the USA and standing on the banks of the Thames in London!»).
Even the new migration of nomads worldwide does not make them non-nomads. Although in America, in Europe, all Kazakhs shout, «We are for democracy!». They dont even realize theyre crying. This is a manifestation of their selfishness (and complexes).
Those who shout, «We are for democracy!» have received property in the first generation. They do not suspect themselves that they are calling, «We do not love our wild homeland of nomads» the very place where the khans power should have taken place. But it did not occur, and the nomads are to blame. The current government declares a «desire for democracy,» but it still looks very much like an autocratic (uncultured, uncivilized) by European standards. And thats right. This is our nomadic government. And do not run away from it in different directions, imitating white people. The white people have long since fled, which cannot be stopped. The end of the world has already been prepared for all nations.
Lets build from the material that we have. And immediately do without show-offs.
It would be best if you started with work. We need to start with responsibility.
Chapter 16
Happy boors
Why are there many fools and few smart ones?
Because while an intelligent person thinks, fools multiply
So, if you want fascism, force the provincials to flee
The main principle of the right is hierarchy.
The main principle of the left is equality.
Throughout history, people have observed hierarchy, a conservative society that makes up a pyramid of estates. This has not always coincided with justice; in most cases, traditional society looks unfair. But this is an outside view. This is a migrants view. The guest will never understand the order in the house, but he can feel the discipline. Maybe a conservative society does not give so much freedom, and the guest will find the air stale and the downcast eyes of the household extinguished. However, discipline is needed to maintain order. Any shift to the left, towards freedom, violates order in every house. First of all, the order of inheritance, literal inheritance, when younger brothers beat up older ones to change the will, literally, when young revolutionaries overthrow old men with the banner of revolution in their hands. But this case is a crisis of conservative morality. Traditional society reproduces quickly; traditional families have many children, and any new invention of technology and officials will face a queue of mothers with hungry children in their arms. The worst answer would be: «You gave birth to them for yourself!» No, they gave birth to them for you! They gave birth to soldiers for you. The time of the long world creates a hidden mobilization; mobilization accelerates after every technical perfection, after every invention.
And to fight with whom?
From this moment, internal migration begins because beggars have nothing to bequeath to their children heirs without inheritance «attack» cities. Beggars dont have servants. The revolutionaries are mostly younger. If there are noble teachers for them, they do not follow the queue for ideological reasons. If there are bad guides and no teachers, many impudents turn into loud hypocrites. Even in a so-called democracy, rules are needed. Otherwise, crime will undermine everything (like it does the Latin American mafia; the mafia duplicates the conservative order everywhere). But, as you know, all the «newcomers» and «collective farmers» are orphans and democrats when they meet in the square, first with socialists, then by fascists (or maybe by communists of the Stalinist Maoist type of communism of the 20th century). Because all visitors have traditional values in their blood (hierarchy and discipline are almost in their genes), they quickly get used to order.
But even in the new column with banners, they feel good. They feel the discipline of their home.
What kind of democracy is this? You are right, and this is not a democracy. Democracy gives millions of Zerefs hope. Who gets registered on the stock exchange, someone who already works at a factory, a company. Someone will be even more lucky they even buy shares of their companies. At this moment, everyone, not only the visitors, is in a good mood. Prosperity is ahead (thats what they think)
But these people are vulnerable.
The fascist trend around the world in the 20th century shows only one thing.
The mess in society (country) begins when insignificant people climb up and do not follow the rules. As long as everything is good, as long as there is the first prosperity, they do keep the queue, and it is even profitable to keep the queue. Democracy is an extraordinary society. This is a society of happy boors. But when happiness ends, happy louts quickly turn into fascists. They hate the whole world. All fascists are internal migrants, disappointed at the end of the queue, gentle philistines. New crowds of visitors, looking at them, are also angry, but there is no previous freebie! You cant live on robbery, theft, and corruption alone. But these are the habits of millions. When bright hopes are dashed, many people begin to draw swastikas on their bodies. There is a systemic queue violation.
The anarchists themselves, who have despised the conservative queue, now want a different order. And they like it if provocateurs call them masters. You are the owners! Thats what they tell people about the gentle construction of civilized orphans. You are a superior race! So you are the owners of this territory. You can skip the queue. These people did not keep the queue at the first prosperity when they got a little rich (and some even a lot). They liked to live with the looting of the state by officials the same upstarts. Now they are told you are the owners; who wouldnt like it? Upstart officials cant think of anything else. They will attempt. But they will turn out to be the mafia again. Hence, there is rapid nationalism, the combat flying squads, and field commanders.
Do you know why warlords seized power in Libya after Muammar Gaddafi Khan?
Because the Zerefs men lack organization, they are all nomadic anarchists. In such a conservative world devoid of order, order is restored. Nomadic anarchists love democracy, they like not to keep the queue when there is no father, when no one is watching. When there is a father, and there are relatives, there will be no democracy.
Democracy is a time of immoralism. Now, I think you are convinced: people who are not adapted to live without order, who do not have the consciousness «this is mine, and this is yours,» love democracy, quickly turn into democrats. And then they are afraid of her. In a democracy, they like the first freebie, the first sip of freedom (all highlanders and nomads behave untied for the first time in the city). But they quickly gather in a bunch at the first danger. And again, they recognize the seniority.
These are just the latest data, the latest facts of our days. Why is Europe the birthplace of old fascism? Because fascism is the quick order of all internal migrants. Europe was the first to lose its kinship. It was in Europe that everything got mixed up the concept of a nation took place.
Chapter 17
Only a socialist Khan can
The trouble is with your officials. They put my funds for modernization, wages, and solving environmental problems in their pockets. The greed of your compatriots killed the miners. Watching their behavior, I was always amazed. How can you hate your people so much?! As long as you have such leaders, the victims will multiply
Lakshmi Mittal