Jews differ from all nations in their doctrine of being chosen by God. That is, they built (and are building) their relationship based on the dichotomy of us and the Goyim, we and the pagans, «us and them.» This meant that every Jew was a privileged member of a privileged people. (All other conservative nations have an internal hierarchy; there is an elite, and there is a rabble. Low people have to know their place. Ordinary people have always known their place until Modern times. Aspen will not bear oranges. And when the crisis of power system morality comes, when the queue is broken, the inevitable troubled times will come. Hindus used to say that the power of the Vaishnavas, especially the Sudras, after the troubles, is the most dangerous).
Jews are no less conservative people who adhere to traditions, primarily temple traditions; that is, Jews have everything tied to temples and the spiritual component of Jewish rituals they may be one of the most conservative peoples on the earth, besides with will. Jews also revere elders and knowledge, but especially the spiritual teachers of the Rabbis (even the Tzaddiks in exile). If we take as a basis that the government -system morality is in crisis, like in other nations, then Jews do not break the order, do not dream of overtaking spiritual people for a piece (especially today, at the moment of the greatest triumph of democracy among all Goyim when the Goyim everywhere mired in corruption at the instigation, of course, of the same, the richest Jewish clans. Jews are well aware, due to their 2000-year residence among the other folks, of the greed of people, including their elites, and the lack of real leaders. Therefore, this situation of the absence of elites to them needs to be maintained. The situation can be presented as follows. If Jews are guided by the motto «we and they», then the elites of other post-traditional peoples live by the principles: the state is me, also «we and you», that is, we are the elite, and you are our slaves. Thus, for the most primitive, at the moment of crisis, «we and you» turns into «the first me or the second?» It is the most archaic form of hierarchy. And at the moment of the highest democracy among the Goyim «we are no worse than others», which tacitly means «beat the elite» or «choose clowns» to power, the worse at the top, the more fun for us. Hence, it is noticeable that all conditional Goyim constantly live with complexes, carrying a sense of inferiority, depression, jealousy, envy, and schadenfreude. Goyim without an elite and morality become callous and bestial, turn into Nazis and fascists, or imitate become crypto liberals and Democrats. But its a mask that jumps off easily. That is why it is very important for such people «without a temple» to have an elite or at least respect for knowledge, talent, and professionalism. Do the people «without a temple» respect ordinary teachers now? No, they dont respect anybody. They are fighting for literally any piece today, like jackals and dogs. The most talented and gifted are being bullied on social media. Why? But because there is no morality, no system, no support. There is no confidence in the future. The situation is at the sinking ship and «save who can»).
Chapter 5
How to avoid war and slavery
For the Lord your God will bless you, as He has told you, and you will lend to many nations, but you wont lend to your people
Deuteronomy 15:6
!Meanwhile, the path is indicated through which domination over the peoples will be established «to lend to many peoples» (independently, you can give to one person or to the government at interest. The size of the receiving subject does not change the essence. After a while, both the person and the government will get into debt)
This is obvious, how such spirituality and commitment to one source determine the fate of a nation.
The very attitude of being chosen, «us or them» we and other peoples in the spiritual world has been crucial for 3,000 years.
What to do with strangers?
All pagans modern nationalists, fascists and pagans (including pagans before our era) know (knew) perfectly well. Strangers were always treated badly. Literally and violently. Violence is a clear indicator of barbarism and lack of spirituality.
All pagans (including modern ones) have many gods. They worship they perform ancestor worship rituals. Either this is the most massive group of people now worship the golden calf (that is, money). Even if several billion people go to Buddhist temples, churches, and mosques, this does not prevent them from thinking about money. Sorry, there is no communism yet. There was no Second Coming, and there was no kingdom of God. De jure, you can declare yourself a Christian, a Muslim, a Hindu, de facto behave like the same Jews who did not wait for Moses from Sinai.
Its another matter when there is one G-d.
You can lend money to strangers at interest, but you can and should help your own people. Isnt there a monotony here? Moreover, is there no chauvinism?
And how else to confirm your superiority?
Its very simple to lend money. Then harvest the «harvest». No violence everything is voluntary.
The whole world today gives loans, loans, and tranches at interest. Who did modern bankers learn from? And who were the first bankers? Who wrote out the first bills? The whole world is obsessed with profit today. Are all people in the race for money? Who they all work for during the race madness. Who do all these stock exchanges work for?
Its not hard to guess. All these bankers, industrialists, fund managers, brokers, and prime ministers have received interest in growth they make a profit for themselves, and at the same time, they return it to whom? to the original source. Everyone who takes out a loan or mortgage plays by the rules (to be more precise, according to the prescription of the most ancient spiritual monument.
Why are there no Christian banks in the world?
Why does the Pope bless all kinds of obscenities?
Why are almost all European politicians now clowns?
Because they depend on money, maybe they personally are not literally slaves of money, although it is doubtful they are also evolutionarily derived, as in an incubator, of European bourgeois values. And who is the bourgeoisies god?
Are there any alternatives to this?
Islamic banks are practicing Islamic banking.
They do not give in to growth. After receiving the result, the result is divided into agreed parts. In case of failure, one Islamic bank loses money, the other side expended efforts. Full trust
Although Islamic banking currently represents a small percentage of global transactions, it is an obvious alternative to global paganism. Clown rulers have not yet been recorded in Islamic countries or even secular communities states that do not practice fundamental Islam.
Chapter 6
Who do Kazakhs study with?
You can love yourself. You can love people. Jews are obviously the most ideological in this sense.
When the sages were looking for the Philosophers Stone, other revolutionaries constantly fought for freedom, equality, and justice; the Jews believed in themselves and their people. Or rather, they had exceptional faith. This cannot be called simple nationalism, which is known to the world relatively recently. How was it recently? Approximately, maybe 300 years. And the Jews had «nationalism» when no one yet knew what money, property, and the economy were (money has always been in human society, but not everyone). Because of the specific behavior because of the desire for isolation, many looked at Jews with suspicion. The Jews were locked up all the time, one might say, in their little world. More precisely, they gathered to perform a religious cult others were jealously not allowed into this world. Do you want to marry Moishas daughter? Convert to Judaism make a giyur. Keep the commandments of the Torah. And no more questions. In this sense, Jewish women have always been more zealous and submissive: they followed «dont marry them» more strongly than men. (Well, they couldnt, especially after the Babylonian captivity. Moreover, the priest Ezra ordered all Jews to divorce those who had got the «wrong» wife or the wrong husband in 70 years. And after all, everything was fulfilled. In order not to dissolve or disappear among other nations. But that was before our era. However, then, everything was repeated. Jews were being chased. Jews were oppressed. A lot has changed. But the fundamentals have remained the same. Today, the times are liberal, it seems, if we are talking about marriages. That is not the point. There is even an opinion that the USSR was destroyed, too, on purpose because there were many mixed marriages. What nonsense! We know that the USSR collapsed independently see my book «Tradition Against Communism.» When the Russian Revolution took place in 1917, who was accused? No secrets, no Jews. When Russia became a democracy, who did it? Why are there solid oligarchs and bankers Theres something wrong here. The oligarch Berezovsky said that Jews are more adapted to everything. What is, is. They are always ahead. Who are all newspaper editors in our area? Yes, what is there in the region all over Kazakhstan. First, this is the so-called tabloid press, which provides a quick and guaranteed income. Could any Kazakh have guessed about the income? Could any Kazakh write about all sorts of «obscenities» topics that ordinary people read? No, its not. The Kazakh will say: «Uyat.» Like, «Its a shame.» Once, Mingrel Loria, provincial editor, told me: «If I print your philosophical opuses, my newspaper will have fifty readers.» And hes right, unfortunately. Jews are immune, on the contrary, as it were. They know people. They know what people want. And Kazakhs are always interested in fame and honor some kind of position. The Kazakhs hired editors to create an «illumination» of Kazakh democracy the Kazakh showcase. Thirty years of independence have passed. And who are the editors? Theyve grown quite old. But they continue to depict full news counters for the Kazakhs. No, its not just Jews there. There are few Jews among the Kazakhs at all this happened according to history. Basically, during the Great Patriotic War, intellectuals of all kinds moved from the western regions of the USSR to Tashkent and Alma-Ata, including professors, artists, and engineers. I looked at the teaching staff of the Aktobe Medical Institute when the first streams of Kazakh doctors were being prepared (my parents received diplomas in the first stream). Today, their children work well in human rights protection, first of all. In business, its kind of just supposed to be. Legal protection is always on the side of business.
Moreover, even if the very first human rights defender stumbled, all Kazakhstani human rights defenders and, of course, international human rights protection actively stood up for him (no Kazakh dreamed of such protection, especially his small educational newspaper «Bak», «bak» in Kazakh is happiness, short for «bakyt». When it was closed, no one noticed, no one said anything. Except for my late comrade in the opposition, Andrei Klimonov. Because officials and rich Kazakhs, and indeed all Kazakhs, «rights and freedoms» are not in the first place. Officials and the new rich want more money, and ordinary Kazakhs want to compete or are busy looking for daily bread).
Interestingly, all Jews used to be socialists, advocating equality and justice. Today, everyone is liberal. For human rights, for freedom. I will say that for a Kazakh and a Jew, freedom is something completely different (Kazakhs are paternal; they can lose everything if they are free). But the Kazakhs, again, as if they got into the first year and got excellent marks from the teachers. The Elbasy of the first one has already been replaced by the second president after thirty years of rule, and only liberals are on the air. Not Jews, and not Russians, but Kazakhs. These Democrats of the first wave have suffered a complete defeat and must sink through the ground, but again and again, the same faces. Kazakhs are liberals, piece pensioners + plus urban burghers from NGOs, which means that they receive money from the West for their views (bla- bla- bla), and they run ahead of the locomotive. We are liberals! We are Democrats! We are the best students! It looks somewhat comical. It causes nothing but irony. Everyone knows that money rules the whole world. But we want to demonstrate something. What do they say? A Kazakh without show-offs is a non-showy Kazakh. (This does not mean that «nagyz» Kazakh should be engaged exclusively in the glorification of ancestors).
Chapter 7
Unusual laws. 613
«The closer a state is to falling, the more laws it has.»
Cicero
«The ruin is not in the closets, but in the heads.»
Bulgakov. A dogs heart
Formal laws and regulations are laid down in codes.
There are informal laws. They are more effective in conservative communities, among people who adhere to tradition.
There are many informal laws. But much less than formal ones. However, it is believed that the more cultured and civilized a people are, the more formal laws they have.
What happens if the conservative people «with traditions» have too much civilizational formality, and the laws do not work, after all, total corruption, mafia, and crime?
What is an informal relationship? Its when youre to me, Im to you. You and I are relatives, brothers in law, and classmates we can always come to an agreement.
What to do? How do you avoid «you to me, I to you»? How do you stop writing new laws that dont work in such an environment?
This means that there is no need to chase after «advanced countries»
But lets think about it. Lets look back.
Lets compare it.
To begin with, the history of all peoples is connected with religion. Moreover, the economic side, or what people were doing, directly impacted spiritual life.
We Kazakhs are Muslims. Jews are adherents of Judaism. This, for example.
The nomadic tribes of Central Asia did not immediately become Orthodox. The adoption of Islam stretched among the Nomads for five hundred years (more than five centuries). Moreover, the nomadic Turks were the main rivals of the same nomadic Arabs before the fall of the Western Turkic Khaganate. Well, intraspecific rivalry is much more cruel than interspecific rivalry it has long been known if such a strange similarity of a nomadic «species» is appropriate here at all. In those days, the Arabs and Turks had cattle breeding as their primary occupation. Both the Nomadic Arabs and the Nomadic Turks had something to share. The question immediately creeps up: isnt that why almost all Turks became Muslims? The Western Turkic Khaganate collapsed like the USSR. (When all the newly minted presidents who appeared after the collapse of the USSR republics immediately proclaimed the direction of «democracy.» They built communism, and afterward, they turned 180 degrees. This is all because the winners always dictate the direction: in the case of the USSR, it is the USA; in the competition of nomads, it is the Arabs). Thus, the Arabs, in the form of winners, first rode to the oases of Transoxiana to control the caravans with goods. Then, they took care of the rest of the nomads so that they would not rob passing caravans out of savagery and indiscipline. Everything is logical.
Of course, faith is of great importance already because it determines the future. But this is not our topic: although Kazakhs and Jews come into contact with each other spontaneously and indirectly. Spontaneity and mediation are already in the fact that Kazakhs did not directly contact Jews until the 21st century. However, due to the development of «democracy» and market relations after the collapse of the USSR, they joined the global liberal market trend. There is no need to remind you who the inventor of banking is. The fact that Kazakhs today trade everything (primarily natural resources) and do not roam «according to their grandfathers habit» is a spontaneous and age-old mediation. As befits all conservative peoples, Kazakhs have never recognized money as the meaning of life. Kazakhs got acquainted with money, and now monetary relations, we can say recently, in the 19th century so-so, in the 20th century in the form of a Soviet salary, and only in the 21st century in the form of a bank loan and a means of enrichment.